Written by David Rodgers

Quality and Operations Perspective

Written by David Rodgers, Lean Six Sigma Black Belt and ASQ-certified quality leader. This guide applies quality and process-improvement methods to workplace safety management from a quality and operations perspective. The author is not a certified safety professional, industrial hygienist, occupational physician, or lawyer.

Last editorial review: September 24, 2026. Educational content only: not medical, legal, or regulatory advice. Follow your organization's policies and the requirements that apply to you, and have subject-matter experts review any change to a live process.

  • Lean Six Sigma Black Belt
  • ASQ CQE
  • ASQ CMQ/OE
  • Quality systems and process improvement

A job hazard analysis breaks a job into steps, finds the hazards in each, and decides how to control them. It is the most practical form of risk assessment because it follows the work as it is really done, and it is done by the people who do it.

This guide covers which jobs to analyze first, a ten-step method, hazard prompts, how to write good steps and hazards, and how to use the result in training and standard work. A worked example analyzes loading a press, with scores before and after the controls.

Scores in the example are illustrative. Agree your own scales with the people who do the work.

Open the JHA Builder Get the JHA Worksheet

Before You Start

Educational content. This guide applies quality and process-improvement methods to workplace safety. It is not legal, regulatory, or professional safety advice, and it does not replace your organization's safety program, the laws and standards that apply to you, or qualified safety professionals. Requirements differ by country, region, and industry: OSHA and ISO 45001 are used as common references. The worked example is illustrative.

What a Job Hazard Analysis Is

A job hazard analysis (JHA), sometimes called a job safety analysis (JSA), breaks a job into steps, finds the hazards in each step, and decides how to control them. It is a detailed form of risk assessment for one task, done by the people who know the job.

Focuses on the Task

A JHA looks at what people actually do, step by step, so it finds hazards that an area-level assessment misses.

Builds Skill and Ownership

People who take part learn to see hazards, and they own the controls they helped choose.

Feeds Everything Else

A good JHA becomes the basis of the work instruction, the training, and the risk register.

Cheap and Fast

A team can analyze a typical job in an hour or two, using a form and a pen.

Which Jobs to Analyze First

PriorityWhy
Jobs with a history of injuries or near missesThe system has already shown that the job can hurt people
Jobs where one mistake could cause a severe injuryHigh severity, even when frequency is low
New jobs and jobs that have changedNew equipment, materials, or methods bring new hazards
Non-routine and infrequent jobsCleaning, maintenance, clearing jams, and start-up and shutdown are where many injuries happen
Jobs that are complex or depend on many stepsMore steps give more chances for error
Jobs done by new or temporary workersLess experience and less informal knowledge

List the jobs in your area, rank them on severity potential and injury history, and start with the top few. Do not try to analyze every job at once.

How to Do a JHA

Choose the job Rank by severity and history Break it into steps In order, what is done Find the hazards Per step: what could hurt whom Choose controls Hierarchy of controls Review and brief With the people who do the job Keep it current Review on change and after events
A JHA moves from choosing the job to keeping it current.
  1. Choose the job from your priority list and agree its limits: where it starts and where it ends.
  2. Assemble the team. The person who does the job, a supervisor, someone with safety knowledge, and ideally someone who has not done the job and will ask naive questions.
  3. Watch the job being done, or do it as it is really done. Do not analyze it from memory at a desk.
  4. Break the job into steps, in order, describing what is done and not how. Five to twelve steps is typical. Too few hides hazards, and too many buries them.
  5. Find the hazards in each step. Ask what could go wrong, how a person could be hurt, and what could lead to it. Use hazard prompts to avoid missing categories.
  6. Score the risk with the controls that exist today (severity × likelihood).
  7. Decide the controls, working down the hierarchy: eliminate, substitute, engineer, then administrative and PPE. Score the residual risk.
  8. Assign owners and dates, and put the controls in place.
  9. Review the result with the people who do the job, brief them on it, and file it with the work instruction.
  10. Review again when the job, equipment, or materials change, and after any incident or near miss.

Hazard Prompts for Each Step

CategoryQuestions to ask
Contact and caught-inCan a hand, finger, hair, or clothing be caught, pinched, drawn in, or crushed?
Struck by or againstCan anything hit the person, or can the person hit something?
FallsIs there a fall from height, a slip, or a trip? Are surfaces wet, uneven, or cluttered?
OverexertionIs anything heavy, awkward, repetitive, or done in a bad posture?
EnergyCan stored or unexpected energy be released: electrical, hydraulic, pneumatic, gravity, thermal?
SubstancesAre fumes, dust, vapors, or liquids present? Is ventilation adequate?
Noise, heat, and coldAre noise, vibration, extreme temperature, or radiation present?
Sharp edges and hot surfacesCan anyone be cut, punctured, burned, or scalded?
Human factorsCould fatigue, hurry, distraction, poor lighting, or unclear instructions lead to error?
Non-routine eventsWhat happens during a jam, a breakdown, a spill, or an emergency?

Writing Good Steps and Good Hazards

DoDo notExample
Describe what is done, in orderDescribe how the work should be done, or list rules“Load the part into the fixture” and not “Be careful when loading”
State the hazard and the harmWrite a vague warning“Hand caught in the die as the press closes: crushing injury” and not “Press hazard”
Write a control that someone can checkWrite “be careful” or “pay attention”“Light curtain stops the press when the beam is broken”
Include the people who do the jobWrite it for them without themThe operator describes the real steps

Worked Example: Loading a Press

At Riverside Plant, an illustrative 140-employee metal fabrication and assembly plant, a team of an operator, the supervisor, and the safety coordinator analyzed loading a 25 kg part into a press. They watched the job on two shifts and found six steps. All figures are illustrative.

#Job stepHazardInitial riskControlsLevelResidual risk
1Lift the part (25 kg) from the pallet to the cartAwkward lift of a heavy part12 (High)Vacuum lift assist at the pallet stationEngineering6 (Medium)
2Push the cart to the pressCart strikes a person or foot9 (Medium)Marked pedestrian aisle, speed limit, and a cart with a guarded wheelEngineering6 (Medium)
3Load the part into the press fixtureHand caught in the die area as the press closes15 (High)Light curtain and two-hand control on the pressEngineering5 (Medium)
4Start the press cycleUnexpected cycle or stored energy during adjustment10 (High)Lockout procedure for adjustment and die changes, with a verified zero-energy checkAdministrative5 (Medium)
5Remove the finished partSharp burrs on the edge8 (Medium)Deburr at the source in the previous operation; cut-resistant gloves as backupElimination4 (Low)
6Clear a jam in the dieReaching into the die with hands15 (High)Hand tools and lockout before any reach into the die; jam-clearing procedureAdministrative5 (Medium)
0 5 10 15 20 25 1 Lift the part (25 kg) from the palle 12 6 2 Push the cart to the press 9 6 3 Load the part into the press fixture 15 5 4 Start the press cycle 10 5 5 Remove the finished part 8 4 6 Clear a jam in the die 15 5 Before the controls (colored by band)After the controls
The controls bring every step down. The worst steps, the die area and clearing a jam, fall from 15 to 5.

What the analysis found. Four of the six steps were rated High before the controls, and the total of the six scores was 69. After the controls the highest score is 6 and the total is 31, a reduction of 55%. Four of the six controls are engineering or elimination controls.

Two steps still depend on procedures. The press start (lockout for adjustment) and clearing a jam are High hazards that rely on administrative controls. The team asked whether an engineering control was possible, and put an interlocked access guard on the jam-clearing area on its improvement list so the press cannot cycle while someone reaches in. Until it is fitted, the procedure carries the risk, and the residual score is verified at the next audit.

Fill in your own job on the Job Hazard Analysis Worksheet or with the JHA and Risk Assessment Builder, which flags steps that stay High or rely on weak controls.

Using the JHA

  • Training. Use it to teach new people the hazards and the controls for the job, and check understanding.
  • Standard work. Put the safety steps into the work instruction. See Standard Work.
  • The risk register. Carry the significant hazards into the site register.
  • Incident investigation. When something goes wrong, compare what happened with the JHA to see what was missed.
  • Change management. Update the JHA whenever the job, equipment, or materials change.

Common Mistakes

Doing It at a Desk

The JHA describes the procedure and not the real job.

Too Broad or Too Detailed

Two steps that hide hazards, or fifty that nobody reads.

Vague Controls

“Be careful” and “pay attention” are not controls.

Relying on PPE

Gloves and glasses chosen when a guard or a changed process is possible.

Filing and Forgetting

A JHA that is never briefed, used, or updated.

Excluding the Workers

The people who do the job are not in the room.

Self-Assessment Questions

  • Have we ranked our jobs and analyzed the highest-risk ones first?
  • Were the people who do the job part of the analysis, and did we watch the job being done?
  • Do our controls come from the top of the hierarchy where possible?
  • Are JHAs used in training and work instructions, and updated when jobs change?
  • Do we check that the controls we chose are in place?

Job Hazard Analysis: Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between a JHA and a JSA?

They are two names for the same method. Job hazard analysis (JHA) and job safety analysis (JSA) both break a job into steps, identify the hazards, and decide on controls. Some organizations also use the term task risk assessment.

How many steps should a JHA have?

Typically five to twelve. Too few steps hide hazards, and too many make the analysis unreadable. If a job has many more steps, consider splitting it into two jobs. Each step should describe what is done, in order, and not how it should be done.

Who should take part in a JHA?

The person who does the job, their supervisor, and someone with safety knowledge, and ideally someone who has not done the job, who will ask naive questions. The analysis should be based on watching the job being done, not on memory at a desk.

How often should a JHA be reviewed?

Review it when the job, equipment, materials, or people change; after any incident or near miss involving the job; and on a regular schedule, often once a year for high-risk jobs. Keep it with the work instruction so that changes to one prompt changes to the other.

Is PPE a good control in a JHA?

It is a control of last resort. PPE depends on correct selection, fit, and use every time, and it does not remove the hazard. Look first for elimination, substitution, and engineering controls, and use PPE as a back-up or where nothing better is practical.

Sources and Further Reading

  • US Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Job Hazard Analysis (OSHA 3071).
  • Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety, Job Safety Analysis guidance.
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Hierarchy of Controls.
  • ANSI/ASSP Z10.0, Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems.
  • ISO 45001:2018, clause 6.1.2 on hazard identification and assessment of risks (check current edition).